You lucky bastards. Here in America we’re still a bunch of greedy, religious, morons who fight pointless wars, are prejudiced, pollute at alarming rates, and actually believe that we’re protected by the giant “space daddy” in the sky. America needs to become more like Europe.
THX ! I feel flattered and cajoled
But whats shiny in the outside is slowly rotting in the inside. We are about to have the same fate as the USA and fail cuz of “mismanagement” and not changin our way of life. We’re still super awsome but more and more experts say its alarming how fast we re going down… Sad.
And you’re the biggest country in the world in terms of exports, your economy is one of the healthiest in the world, your products are recognized in the world as top quality goods, your cars are unbelievably good, your highways are speed limit free and still you have less deaths on the road than France for example, and your beer is fantastic. Germany is just brilliant. The only thing bad about it is the language. Which is frankly awful. But all the rest is perfect.
he found the dumbest christians he could find to interview in this movie. i saw the movie its pretty funny. alot of christianity seems evil sometimes. im talkiing about the ones you see on tv late at night asking you to send in your life savings
“one example”-ask so many poor africans how they feel about Christians, especially the ones who drilled water wells for them so their children did’nt have to die of thirst. Them “crazy” Christians! Just a thought……..
but how stupid we are we believe in acai berry and miracle products at the time, imagine a lot of ancient people dealing with nature religion was a need this time is a lousy and heavy weight to humanity
I´m amazed how so many people have not wake up, its so stupid and scary, to keep believing in a lie someone created centuries ago, if i aome up with something like cristhianism today no one will believe, because all of the info we have today. but thousand of years ago ¡¡¡¡¡ and still believe in that stupid min d nubbling non sense, is AMAZING.
luckily there are people like him .
Actually science does not reject ”other realms” seeing as there is Quantum Mechanics right now which has shown that the human mind can even effect reality
patr11… finally! And so the 100% religious dogmatic “believers” and the 100% “rational” atheists are all basing their views upon assumptions which make them avoid seeing certain ideas.
What about the imagery seen during near-death experience or on entheogentic mushrooms (manna from the Old Testament? Tibetan Book of the Dead?). What about the idea of other realms of beings normally unseen but during stress or with certain entheogens, these are seen? Religion and science dismiss this.
part10… do we humans really “know” Reality from either dogmatic religion or from rational science. The answer is NO!
“rationalism ” is “representing with symbols”. To rationally represent even the taste of an apple with words would require endless volumes of text and still not be really useful.
To limit experience of Ultimate Reality to dogmatic ritual devoid of it’s real substance (replacing entheogenic mushrooms with mere flour wafers!) is a facade
part9… And so, the fundamentalist Christians represent one side of the coin, whilst the total “rational” atheist represent the opposite side of the same coin. In my opinion, that entire coin is not valid currency haha! Both sides are making assumptions and not looking far enough into all aspects of what humans have experienced of Reality.
To sum up, do limited humans (as formations of basically ‘code’ within Reality animated by what “we” might label ‘potential for life’ …
part8… some deeper religious people will see their own religion as merely a symboolic system to “point to” Ultimate Reality whereas dogmatic literal religious followers are blindly limiting their understanding to jut “believing” certain stories without deeper symbolic meaning.
Literal scientists may actually believe they are truly describing Reality but they are realy defining “models or reality”.
And so both in religion and science, there can exist the assumption of “knowing Reality”
part7 … The idea of “intelligent entity” could be a bias created by human biology. It could be how our way of interpreting Reality as mobile animals breaks Reality up into “objects”.
The “object” can only be seen as an object in comparison to something which it is not. So by labeling Ultimate Reality as “Heavenly Father” it not only has human bias but sexist bias … a male object.
Religious dogmas and traditions are cultural systems and ‘biased filters’ trying to label Reality…
part6 … and I can’t blame them since these are obviously just human-created rules or biologically instilled rules.
A concept of “Ultimate Reality” has some problems. Some feel some “intelligent entity” must have created the Universe. But they never seem to question where this “intelligent entity” came from if “things” must have creators to exist as “pots” have potters (yes, this is caveman era reasoning that “objetcs must have “creators”)
part5… Human biology is a filter. The physical brain is a filter. It interprets sensory data and creates a “reality” which is a result of the filter. It is not seeing “Ultimate Reality” but a ‘relative reality’. All religions contain colouration from cultures. Many of these are social rules. These can be useful but are still culturally ‘relative reality’.
People who don’t believe religions often attack the huge accumulation of relative rules, dogmas, descriptions of “God”.
part4… “Father, “Him, He” “His” in Abrahamic religions is a cultural bias. It is a colouration of “Ultimate Reality” into not only a limited human bias but a cultural and sexist bias.
The Vedic culture Males sky father an d female Earth mother was at least balanced!
So if you take away all layers og human invention (religious dogma, stories, rules) what is there left to the mystical experience. The very real presence of experience by some people of total connectivity to all of Reality
part3… And so, due to our biology (biology itsellf is a word : a specific or limted formationwithin Reality) we interpret Reality within very narrow limits. And thus, we label Reality from limited point of view. So patriarchal culture labels “that from which Reality stems from” as ‘male sky father’. This Deus is from the Vedic Dyaus Pita … (Zues, Ju_piter, Deus, “Heavenly Father”). The concept of Earth mother from the vedic religion was dropped. Patriarchal religion is male-biased!
The question is what i meant by this word. A word is a label meant to define some apparent “object”. So by even labeling “something” as “God” you have already limited your definition to some sort of noun or object. This could be a very misleading assumption by humans.
Human biology as animals sees Reality in very specific ways. As part of this, we see what we seem to feel are “real” objects. This is a biased way of interpretting Reality from one point of view.
I don’t believe in gods or “God” in the normal way. Firstly, one must look up the etymology of the word “God”. Germanic; “that which is invoked”: “to pour”: “poured Earth”:reference to “spirit present in a burial mound”
This is a word that is like a sticky note stuck onto a concept. To be truly honest, everyone must question what they mean by using the word.
Because the word has so many many “sticky notes” on it, I refuse to use it except with exclamation marks. “God” is a word…
dennisadair said
October 23 2009 @ 9:46 pm
I am glad that I want have to put up with Bill Maher because he is going straight to HELL!
LoopholemanIII said
October 23 2009 @ 9:46 pm
You lucky bastards. Here in America we’re still a bunch of greedy, religious, morons who fight pointless wars, are prejudiced, pollute at alarming rates, and actually believe that we’re protected by the giant “space daddy” in the sky. America needs to become more like Europe.
mani8567 said
October 23 2009 @ 9:46 pm
watch any unreleased movie by going to “jake-tutorial-blog com”.. just follow the tut..
caramelking2000 said
October 23 2009 @ 9:46 pm
Big nose AMALEK KIKE still doing his sorcery!
3rdMayhem said
October 23 2009 @ 9:46 pm
THX ! I feel flattered and cajoled
But whats shiny in the outside is slowly rotting in the inside. We are about to have the same fate as the USA and fail cuz of “mismanagement” and not changin our way of life. We’re still super awsome but more and more experts say its alarming how fast we re going down… Sad.
JPChabert said
October 23 2009 @ 9:46 pm
And you’re the biggest country in the world in terms of exports, your economy is one of the healthiest in the world, your products are recognized in the world as top quality goods, your cars are unbelievably good, your highways are speed limit free and still you have less deaths on the road than France for example, and your beer is fantastic. Germany is just brilliant. The only thing bad about it is the language. Which is frankly awful. But all the rest is perfect.
TheTupacolypse said
October 23 2009 @ 9:46 pm
when you realize why people call Zeus a myth, you’ll understand why I don’t believe in God.
rowin09 said
October 23 2009 @ 9:46 pm
he found the dumbest christians he could find to interview in this movie. i saw the movie its pretty funny. alot of christianity seems evil sometimes. im talkiing about the ones you see on tv late at night asking you to send in your life savings
helpmetony said
October 23 2009 @ 9:46 pm
“one example”-ask so many poor africans how they feel about Christians, especially the ones who drilled water wells for them so their children did’nt have to die of thirst. Them “crazy” Christians! Just a thought……..
TorstensHouse said
October 23 2009 @ 9:46 pm
The best part of the movie is the senator XD
joackogdl said
October 23 2009 @ 9:46 pm
but how stupid we are we believe in acai berry and miracle products at the time, imagine a lot of ancient people dealing with nature religion was a need this time is a lousy and heavy weight to humanity
3rdMayhem said
October 23 2009 @ 9:46 pm
one of the reasons i am proud to be a German: only 12% remaining true christians, only 4% muslims, less than 1% jews
WE rule!!!!*
*in at least that and green-tech
joackogdl said
October 23 2009 @ 9:46 pm
I´m amazed how so many people have not wake up, its so stupid and scary, to keep believing in a lie someone created centuries ago, if i aome up with something like cristhianism today no one will believe, because all of the info we have today. but thousand of years ago ¡¡¡¡¡ and still believe in that stupid min d nubbling non sense, is AMAZING.
luckily there are people like him .
nielso212 said
October 23 2009 @ 9:46 pm
Actually science does not reject ”other realms” seeing as there is Quantum Mechanics right now which has shown that the human mind can even effect reality
zetetic0void said
October 23 2009 @ 9:46 pm
patr11… finally! And so the 100% religious dogmatic “believers” and the 100% “rational” atheists are all basing their views upon assumptions which make them avoid seeing certain ideas.
What about the imagery seen during near-death experience or on entheogentic mushrooms (manna from the Old Testament? Tibetan Book of the Dead?). What about the idea of other realms of beings normally unseen but during stress or with certain entheogens, these are seen? Religion and science dismiss this.
zetetic0void said
October 23 2009 @ 9:46 pm
part10… do we humans really “know” Reality from either dogmatic religion or from rational science. The answer is NO!
“rationalism ” is “representing with symbols”. To rationally represent even the taste of an apple with words would require endless volumes of text and still not be really useful.
To limit experience of Ultimate Reality to dogmatic ritual devoid of it’s real substance (replacing entheogenic mushrooms with mere flour wafers!) is a facade
Tasting the apple is Reality!
zetetic0void said
October 23 2009 @ 9:46 pm
part9… And so, the fundamentalist Christians represent one side of the coin, whilst the total “rational” atheist represent the opposite side of the same coin. In my opinion, that entire coin is not valid currency haha! Both sides are making assumptions and not looking far enough into all aspects of what humans have experienced of Reality.
To sum up, do limited humans (as formations of basically ‘code’ within Reality animated by what “we” might label ‘potential for life’ …
zetetic0void said
October 23 2009 @ 9:46 pm
part8… some deeper religious people will see their own religion as merely a symboolic system to “point to” Ultimate Reality whereas dogmatic literal religious followers are blindly limiting their understanding to jut “believing” certain stories without deeper symbolic meaning.
Literal scientists may actually believe they are truly describing Reality but they are realy defining “models or reality”.
And so both in religion and science, there can exist the assumption of “knowing Reality”
zetetic0void said
October 23 2009 @ 9:46 pm
part7 … The idea of “intelligent entity” could be a bias created by human biology. It could be how our way of interpreting Reality as mobile animals breaks Reality up into “objects”.
The “object” can only be seen as an object in comparison to something which it is not. So by labeling Ultimate Reality as “Heavenly Father” it not only has human bias but sexist bias … a male object.
Religious dogmas and traditions are cultural systems and ‘biased filters’ trying to label Reality…
zetetic0void said
October 23 2009 @ 9:46 pm
part6 … and I can’t blame them since these are obviously just human-created rules or biologically instilled rules.
A concept of “Ultimate Reality” has some problems. Some feel some “intelligent entity” must have created the Universe. But they never seem to question where this “intelligent entity” came from if “things” must have creators to exist as “pots” have potters (yes, this is caveman era reasoning that “objetcs must have “creators”)
zetetic0void said
October 23 2009 @ 9:46 pm
part5… Human biology is a filter. The physical brain is a filter. It interprets sensory data and creates a “reality” which is a result of the filter. It is not seeing “Ultimate Reality” but a ‘relative reality’. All religions contain colouration from cultures. Many of these are social rules. These can be useful but are still culturally ‘relative reality’.
People who don’t believe religions often attack the huge accumulation of relative rules, dogmas, descriptions of “God”.
zetetic0void said
October 23 2009 @ 9:46 pm
part4… “Father, “Him, He” “His” in Abrahamic religions is a cultural bias. It is a colouration of “Ultimate Reality” into not only a limited human bias but a cultural and sexist bias.
The Vedic culture Males sky father an d female Earth mother was at least balanced!
So if you take away all layers og human invention (religious dogma, stories, rules) what is there left to the mystical experience. The very real presence of experience by some people of total connectivity to all of Reality
zetetic0void said
October 23 2009 @ 9:46 pm
part3… And so, due to our biology (biology itsellf is a word : a specific or limted formationwithin Reality) we interpret Reality within very narrow limits. And thus, we label Reality from limited point of view. So patriarchal culture labels “that from which Reality stems from” as ‘male sky father’. This Deus is from the Vedic Dyaus Pita … (Zues, Ju_piter, Deus, “Heavenly Father”). The concept of Earth mother from the vedic religion was dropped. Patriarchal religion is male-biased!
zetetic0void said
October 23 2009 @ 9:46 pm
The question is what i meant by this word. A word is a label meant to define some apparent “object”. So by even labeling “something” as “God” you have already limited your definition to some sort of noun or object. This could be a very misleading assumption by humans.
Human biology as animals sees Reality in very specific ways. As part of this, we see what we seem to feel are “real” objects. This is a biased way of interpretting Reality from one point of view.
zetetic0void said
October 23 2009 @ 9:46 pm
I don’t believe in gods or “God” in the normal way. Firstly, one must look up the etymology of the word “God”. Germanic; “that which is invoked”: “to pour”: “poured Earth”:reference to “spirit present in a burial mound”
This is a word that is like a sticky note stuck onto a concept. To be truly honest, everyone must question what they mean by using the word.
Because the word has so many many “sticky notes” on it, I refuse to use it except with exclamation marks. “God” is a word…